Answer:
r² = 0.5652 < 0.7 therefore, the correlation between the variables does not imply causation
Step-by-step explanation:
The data points are;
X, Y
0.7, 1.11
21.9, 3.69
18, 4
16.7, 3.21
18, 3.7
13.8, 1.42
18, 4
13.8, 1.42
15.5, 3.92
16.7, 3.21
The correlation between the values is given by the relation
Y = b·X + a


Where;
N = 10
∑XY = 499.354
∑X = 153.1
∑Y = 29.68
∑Y² = 100.546
∑X² = 2631.01
(∑ X)² = 23439.6
(∑ Y)² = 880.902
From which we have;


![r = \dfrac{N\sum XY - \left (\sum X \right )\left (\sum Y \right )}{\sqrt{\left [N\sum X^{2} - \left (\sum X \right )^{2} \right ]\times \left [N\sum Y^{2} - \left (\sum Y \right )^{2} \right ]}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7BN%5Csum%20XY%20-%20%5Cleft%20%28%5Csum%20X%20%20%5Cright%20%29%5Cleft%20%28%5Csum%20Y%20%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5Cleft%20%5BN%5Csum%20X%5E%7B2%7D%20-%20%5Cleft%20%28%5Csum%20X%20%20%5Cright%20%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%5Cright%20%5D%5Ctimes%20%5Cleft%20%5BN%5Csum%20Y%5E%7B2%7D%20-%20%5Cleft%20%28%5Csum%20Y%20%20%5Cright%20%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%5Cright%20%5D%7D%7D)

r² = 0.5652 which is less than 0.7 therefore, there is a weak relationship between the variables, and it does not imply causation.
I would first suggest turning them all to one thing, like all decimals, or fractions. I chose decimals.
5.2, -5.6, 3.9, √21. To solve the square root, you have to simplify it. There is the square root of 3, times the square root of 7 which gets 21. These can't be simplified, so we can't simplify through that. But, the closest whole number that is a square root is 16. You can check by multiplying the same number together twice. Doing this will get you about 4.58
5.2, -5.6, 3.9, and ≈ 4.58. This is a simple ordering problem now.
It ends up as -5.6, 3 9/10, √21, 5.2
There are 2 decimals, one negative. There is one square root, and one mixed number. The square root is an infinite decimal when simplified
Hope this helps! ~Malachi
David's pumpkin cost $8.22
His sister's pumpkin cost $4.98
They paid $13.20
Answer:
LN and NK
Step-by-step explanation:
A perpendicular bisector of a line segment divides the line segment into 2 equal halves.
Here, line JM is a perpendicular bisector of line segment LK at point N. So, line JM divides the line segment LK into 2 equal halves.
The two equal halves are segment LN and segment NK.
Therefore, segment LN is congruent to segment NK.
Answer:
1/4 is least
then 3/8
7/8 is greatest
Step-by-step explanation: