Answer:
Explanation:
Dahl has an style, was a subversive, impossible to imitate, was an genius, in prose and caustic was an genius of various characteristics; it's style was individual, but adapted by directors. Dahli's offers a narrative and games more successful than following rules. Perhaps this, more than anything, is the reason why Dahl’s stories excite the imagination of so many people, including adults and children, and why so many readers across stage and screen can’t resist remaking his tales in their own individual style.
Answer:
A) She uses comparisons to show the speaker’s connection to the snake .
Explanation:
Well, in the poem, she sees a snake slithering through the grass. With that view, she remembers a time when she was younger and interacted with a snake:
"A narrow fellow in the grass...
------------------------------------------------
Yet when a child, and barefoot,
I more than once, at morn..."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dickinson also said how the snake seemed scary to a lot of people, but in reality it was not:
"But never met this fellow,
Attended or alone,
Without a tighter breathing,
And zero at the bone.
Answer:
The question is in the photo.
Explanation:
The question is in the photo.
