Please read the following statements (excerpt from an original source, and excerpt from a student's paper) and indicate whether it is considered plagiarism, and if so, what type of plagiarism.
Original Source Material:
The study of learning derives from essentially two sources. Because learning involves the acquisition of knowledge, the first concerns the nature of knowledge and how we come to know things…. The second source in which modern learning theory is rooted concerns the nature and representation of mental life.
References: Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Student Version:
The study of learning derives from essentially two sources. The first concerns the nature of knowledge and how we come to know things. The second source concerns the nature and representation of mental life.
References: Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Answer:
It is not considered plagiarism
Explanation
It is not plagiarism because the student reference the real owner of the idea.
And the student also paraphrase the statement without copy the original word for word.
Answer:
I would say creative maybe? or mischevious..
hope that helped :)
The difference between a dependent clause and an independent clause is that A. a dependent clause cannot stand alone; an independent clause expresses a thought on its own.
Here is an example:
When I arrived home, I immediately went to check my emails.
The clause <em>when I arrived home </em>is dependent, whereas <em>I immediately went to check my emails </em>is independent.
Answer:
?????????????????????????????
Explanation:
In the Persian world, the cupbearers and governors do for the kings was that the cupbearer duty was to make sure the king's food and drink were secure.
The cupbearer maintained a position of great trust in the court because the poison was frequently used to assassinate kings in times past. Nehemiah's vigor, prowess, selfless patriotism, and moral rectitude brought back a fresh, jubilant Judah. Jerusalem's renovation, which had been in ruins for 15 years, got underway. A good and devoted priest named Ezra joined Nehemiah in the task, and the two of them were successful in reestablishing a Jewish community in Jerusalem.
To learn more about Nehemiah visit: brainly.com/question/27455143
#SPJ1