<span>Yes. I think the
narrator had a right to was angry with Stephen Mackaye. The narrator wanted to
stay far of Spot and decided abandon his friend Stephen and Spot, so he ran
away. The narrator continued his life, but once was surprised by his abandoned
friend. Stephen discovered where the narrator was living and left Spot on his
gate, after that, ran away too, exactly how the narrator did. Of course the
narrator was mad with, “now”, your “enemy”. Although, what the narrator did was
not correct too, abandon his “friend” with the dog. In the text has a passage that describes the moment
that the narrator is angry with Stephen: “</span><span>A
year went by. I was back in the office and prospering in all ways--even getting
a bit fat. And then Steve arrived. He didn't look me up. I read his name in the
steamer list, and wondered why. But I didn't wonder long. I got up one morning
and found that Spot chained to the gate-post and
holding up the milkman. Steve went north to Seattle, I learned, that very
morning. I didn't put on any more weight. My wife made me buy him a collar and
tag. And that is why I am disappointed in Stephen Mackaye. I had no idea he was
so mean a man.”</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
It's a clause. Phrases don't have verbs. Invited is a verb.
B. Both poems compare man-made things to natural things. So that both of them deals with nature. They describe how the wildness and slovenliness could take over such vast area. Whatever you do in the nature, even if you want to change something, the things you do will return to the nature and stay in there, again. The objects which the authors write about in the poems show that the nature will dominate them with its power.
<span>Watts takes the narrator’s hand and leads him to the cellar. He calls the many stored and dusty bottles there as “our tomorrows.”
Watts describes the doctor who knew the old medicines and could treat illness with the things that he found in kitchen cabinets.
I took the test, these are 100% correct. </span>
