1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sladkaya [172]
2 years ago
6

Is Colonialism a good thing to learn about why or why no give good explanation

History
2 answers:
ki77a [65]2 years ago
6 0
It’s good to learn about the effect colonialism had on our society and how some people benefited from it (ex. Europeans) by occupying and exploiting another country’s resources and how it destroyed some society’s (ex. The Indigenous people of America). It also helps us have a better understanding of who and what is around us and develop solutions to problems that hinder equality.
andrew11 [14]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Colonialism, in my opinion, was a terrible thing. It was good for the colonizers, but it was awful for the colonized country and people. The problem is that colonialism was founded not just to "import" civilization to those who thought to be barbarians, but also to allow settlers to steal as much as they wanted.

You might be interested in
Describe the effects of the Great Awakening?
8_murik_8 [283]
The major effect of the Awakening was a rebellion against authoritarian religious rule which spilled over into other areas of colonial life. Amidst the growing population of the colonies within the 18th Century and mass public gatherings, charismatic personalities such as Whitefield and Tennent rolled through to deliver their messages. Though a religious movement, the Awakening had repercussions in cultural and political spheres as well. Customs of civility and courtesy, the governing norms of life in the colonies, were set aside in favor of a more quarrelsome age. Practices and mind-sets were changed by the Awakening like never before.
6 0
3 years ago
Which country was not absolutist?
azamat
Russia was no an absolutist
5 0
4 years ago
Why did British Prime Minister Winston Churchill insist on fighting the Nazis instead of negotiating with them?
Talja [164]
"Churchill was at pains to say in his memoirs that he was never going to negotiate with Germany, but it is clear that in 1940 he had not ruled out talking to a non-Hitler German government," said Professor Reynolds. ... This too was played down when Churchill came to writing The Second World War.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Asoka is best known as the monarch of India who
KengaRu [80]
A. converted to Buddhism and encouraged righteous living. 

<span>That's what he was famous for. He also unified all the subcontinent, but his rule was not harsh.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Most Israelites became and
spayn [35]
They became known as the Jews
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which were causes of the Spanish-American War? Choose all answers that are correct. A. Spain refused to remove its forces from t
    9·1 answer
  • French Indochina included _____. <br><br> Cambodia<br><br> Japan<br><br> Korea<br><br> Vietnam
    7·1 answer
  • According to the Tenth Amendment, the powers of
    6·1 answer
  • What does it mean when you say faith actually begins with God
    5·1 answer
  • What was Ulysses journey from Troy to Ithaca
    15·1 answer
  • Which is an example of a domestic policy issue?
    11·2 answers
  • How many aircraft carriers does russia have?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was Johnson chosen as Lincoln’s Vice President?
    8·2 answers
  • Which is the best explanation of unalienable nights
    5·2 answers
  • How might Balboa and Panama City have benefited from the building of the canal?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!