I’m confused what we are suppose to do
now, by traditional method, as "x" progresses towards the positive infinitity, it becomes 100, 10000, 10000000, 1000000000 and so on, and notice, the limit of the numerator becomes large.
BUT, notice the denominator, for the same values of "x", the denominator becomes larg"er" than the numerator on every iteration, ever becoming larger and larger, and yielding a fraction whose denominator is larger than the numerator.
as the denominator increases faster, since as the lingo goes, "reaches the limit faster than the numerator", the fraction becomes ever smaller an smaller ever going towards 0.
now, we could just use L'Hopital rule to check on that.
notice those derivatives atop and bottom, the top is static, whilst the bottom is racing away to infinity, ever going towards 0.
Answer:
0.9617
Step-by-step explanation:
√0.925
= 0.9617
Answer:
2(x-1)=2x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
distribute the 2 into (x-1) so you get 2x-2 which is equal to 2x-2
Answer:
The monetary choices for Ivy’s lunches is to spend less than $16.67 at restaurants and to spend less than $33.33 on groceries in order to to keep her weekly budget to less than $50.
Step-by-step explanation:
This can be determined as follows
x = the amount of dollars spent at restaurants
y = the amount of dollars spent on groceries
Since Ivy decides that she wants to spend at least twice as much on bagged lunches as at restaurants, we have
y = 2x .................. (1)
Since Ivy wants to keep her weekly budget to less than $50, using the x and y, we have:
x + 2x < 50 ............................ (2)
We can now solve for x as follows:
3x + < 50
x < 50 / 3
x < 16.67
Substituting the x < 17 into equation (1) noting that Ivy wants to keep her weekly budget to less than $50, we have:
y < 2 * 16.67
y < 33.33
Therefore, the monetary choices for Ivy’s lunches is to spend less than $16.67 at restaurants and to spend less than $33.33 on groceries in order to to keep her weekly budget to less than $50.
