Answer:
Considering these questions:
1. What if Napoleon had never been born? (In what ways would history have been different? Do you think someone else would have done what Napoleon did? Why?)
<em />
<em>a. If Napoleon was never born, someone else would have been born to undertake his roles but not in exact ways because nature abhors vacuum.</em>
<em>b. History would have been different because no two persons are the same and are created to perform exactly the same roles in nature. They might undertake similar ventures but not exactly the same at the given time.</em>
<em>
c. Yes someone else would have done what Napoleon did but in his own way. As earlier said no two persons are the same with the same mission. </em>
2. The French Revolution began as a struggle for the rights of the people against a single ruler with all the power. It ended by giving all power to another single ruler. Why do you think that happened?
Answer: It happened because the Public cannot be King, it is only a person that shall be given the people's mandate to lead the others. The only thing the people abhor or do not tolerate is high-handedness of a ruler not a leader. No leader is an absolute, that was why we should not allow too much power to be concentrated in an individual because of abuse. L<em>ord Acton said " Power corrupts but absolute Power corrupts absolutely."</em>
More job opportunities (factories/industries)
Urbanization
worked for minimum wages
Answer:
1. Austria- Hungary
Belgium
denmark
france
germany
italy
netherlands
ottoman
empire
portugal
russia
spain
spain
Sweden-norway
UK
USA
2. Africa wasn't invited to the berlin conference
3. the photo has the ans
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. the Russian Empire" Between 1870 and 1900, a number of new nations were created from <span>B. the Russian Empire</span>
<u><em>Many were displeased, which increased tensions over slavery. </em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
