1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Citrus2011 [14]
3 years ago
13

After making makes a series of observations of a certain phenomenon in a laboratory, a scientist develops a theory that explains

these results and predicts new values for future observations. Another scientist makes a series of appropriate observations but his results always contradict the predictions of the theory. What should the first scientist do?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Gekata [30.6K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Try to change his theory to correlate with the new observations, otherwise, discard his theory.

Explanation:

For scientist to develop a thoery, he must be able to follow the following steps:

1. Making of observation

2. List out questions relating to the object of research

3. Create hypotheses

4. Form prediction on the basis of hypotheses

5. Test the prediction

6. Perform iteration

Hence, if the predictions of the theory correlates with the results of the test, the theory will be temporarily confirmed. Otherwise, the scientist should try to change his theory to correlates or be in accordance with the new observations and, if he cannot do so, discard his theory.

You might be interested in
Thoughtful organization can save you a lot of time and frustration. A. True B. False
Fynjy0 [20]
The answer is A true
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Now, write a paragraph explaining how the Fed responded to the financial crisis that began in 2008.
yan [13]
<span>The Fed responded to the crisis by lending money to banks. This ensured that banks had the capital needed to continue daily operations. Additionally, the Fed lowed the federal funds rate. The actions taken by the Fed helped to lower interest rates in order to encourage borrowing and spark economic growth. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the nickname of the college professors FDR turned to for for economic advice
Tema [17]

he called them the Brains Trust

7 0
2 years ago
Which is a basic consideration for arranging and decorating a room?
mr Goodwill [35]
C if im not mistaken
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think the adversarial system is the best method for solving disputes? why or why not?
kherson [118]
No.

As a charged isn't constrained to give prove in a criminal antagonistic continuing, they may not be addressed by a prosecutor or judge unless they do as such. Be that as it may, should they choose to affirm, they are liable to round of questioning and could be discovered liable of prevarication. As the race to keep up a charged individual's entitlement to quiet keeps any examination or round of questioning of that individual's position, it takes after that the choice of advice in the matter of what proof will be called is an essential strategy regardless in the ill-disposed framework and thus it may be said that it is a legal counselor's control of reality. Surely, it requires the aptitudes of insight on the two sides to be decently similarly hollowed and subjected to an unbiased judge.

By differentiate, while litigants in most affable law frameworks can be constrained to give an announcement, this announcement isn't liable to round of questioning by the prosecutor and not given under vow. This enables the litigant to clarify his side of the case without being liable to round of questioning by a talented resistance. Notwithstanding, this is predominantly on the grounds that it isn't the prosecutor yet the judges who question the respondent. The idea of "cross"- examination is altogether due to antagonistic structure of the customary law.
Judges in an antagonistic framework are unprejudiced in guaranteeing the reasonable play of due process, or basic equity. Such judges choose, regularly when called upon by advise as opposed to of their own movement, what confirm is to be conceded when there is a debate; however in some customary law wards judges assume to a greater extent a part in choosing what confirmation to concede into the record or reject. Best case scenario, mishandling legal carefulness would really make ready to a one-sided choice, rendering out of date the legal procedure being referred to—run of law being illegally subordinated by lead of man under such separating conditions.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sam believes that his new coworker, Drogo, is incompetent for the job. He has a preset notion that all the members of Drogo's et
    15·1 answer
  • Frank and gina are looking at an abstract painting in a museum. gina describes objects and people she thinks she sees int he pai
    6·1 answer
  • 2. Which power is shared by both state and national governments?
    9·1 answer
  • The ____________ family sponsored an academy where artists and intellectuals met to discuss the intersection of classical cultur
    11·1 answer
  • On November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall, which had divided East and West Berlin, came down. Why had the Berlin Wall been built?
    15·2 answers
  • Georg Simmel argued that those in higher levels of the stratification system continually seek to distinguish their consumption f
    15·1 answer
  • Identify the items that are found in the State of Georgia Constitution. It contains a "Bill of Rights." It prevents the Governor
    12·2 answers
  • The Daily News just hired five young reporters. Which new employee has the most competence? Kate, who made top grades in journal
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following sentences is written correctly? 1:Simmer the stew {it should be steaming, but not boiling} for about 20 m
    13·2 answers
  • In urban areas, fine particles caused by dust or pollution often cloud the air close to the ground. Which of the following terms
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!