I would go with D. Things like gender/income/race do not affect how informed they are on issues or whether they are willing to speak oit at length, or if they are likely to vote in the next election. So D seems correct
Answer:
The answer is "No"
Explanation:
With the end of the Cold War, researchers found religions development as a ground breaking political power in the contemporary world however it might have been there from the start.
Similarly as there isn't simple approach to characterize religion, so there is no relapse examination conceivable to state when religion is a significant reason alone, when it is a significant however auxiliary reason, and when it is a guise used to encourage war. History is, all things considered, not a science. Yet, religion, when used by a state, causes battle to appear to be good by legitimating it as in reason, declaring that murdering is morally supported, and giving comfort to the dispossessed.
