Answer:
Answer is in explanation
Explanation:
In a command economy, the government determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Private enterprise does not exist in a command economy. The government employs all workers and unilaterally determines their wages and job duties. Some advantages can be less inequality because the government controls the means of production in a command economy, it determines who works where and for how much pay. This power structure contrasts sharply with a free market economy, in which private companies control the means of production and hire workers based on business needs, paying them wages set by invisible market forces. Low Unemployment Levels, Unlike the invisible hand of the free market, which cannot be manipulated by a single company or individual, a command economy government can set wages and job openings to create the unemployment rate and wage distribution that it sees fit. Disadvantages can be Lack of Competition Inhibits Innovation, Critics argue that the inherent lack of competition in command economies hinders innovation and keeps prices from resting at an optimal level for consumers. Although those who favor government control criticize private firms that esteem profit above all else, it is undeniable that profit is a motivator and drives innovation. At least partly for this reason, many advancements in medicine and technology have come from countries with free market economies, such as the United States and Japan. Inefficiency, Efficiency is also compromised when the government acts as a monolith, controlling every aspect of a country's economy. The nature of competition forces private companies in a free market economy to minimize red tape and keep operating and administrative costs to a minimum. If they get too bogged down with these expenses, they earn lower profits or need to raise prices to meet expenses. Ultimately, they are driven out of the market by competitors capable of operating more efficiently.
The French and Indian War pitted the colonies of British America against those of New France, each side supported by military units from the parent country and by Native American allies. Wikipedia
Start date: 1754
End date: 1763
Location: North America
Result: Treaty of Paris
Combatants: France, Indigenous peoples of the Americas, Cherokee, Iroquois, Miꞌkmaq, Mohicans, More
In a short answer No..
reasoning beside that is because it gave harsh punishments to Germany. Which left them in very bad shape and made them fall into the great depression and turn to Hitler which we all know started WW2
hoped this helped ᵔᴥᵔ
Answer:
In this excerpt from Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech suggests that going to war will result in a peaceful political system:
This nation has placed its destiny in the hands and heads and hearts of its millions of free men and women; and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God. Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere. Our support goes to those who struggle to gain those rights or keep them. Our strength is our unity of purpose. To that high concept, there can be no end save victory.
hope it helps mark me as brainliest
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Expressed powers are powers that are directly expressed in the Constitition
