1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
belka [17]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following best describes both Thoreau’s and King’s attitudes toward government and civil disobedience?

History
2 answers:
sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago
8 0

The one that best describes both Thoreau’s and King’s attitudes toward government and civil disobedience is: B. a belief that an individual should disobey unjust laws

In the past , the civil disobedience that conducted by Thoreau is caused by his unwillingness to participate in tax payment that was allocated to fund united states' war. The civil disobedience that conducted by King is caused by racial injustice that occured in united states.

34kurt3 years ago
4 0

B. a belief that an individual should disobey unjust laws

You might be interested in
What is the name of the first written plan of government in America?
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question: When did the Texas Revolution start?
alexdok [17]
I believe October 1835.
6 0
2 years ago
The explosion on the USS Maine and yellow journalism contributed to the U.S. decision to go to war against Spain in 1898. What w
Mandarinka [93]

The correct answer is A, as another factor that contributed to the United States decision to go to war against Spain in 1898 was US intention of protect its investments in Cuba.

The United States, which did not participate in the distribution of Africa or Asia and which, since the beginning of the 19th century, was pursuing an expansionist policy, set its initial expansion area in the Caribbean region and, to a lesser extent, in the Pacific, where his influence had already been felt in Hawaii and Japan. Both in one area and another were valuable Spanish colonies (Cuba and Puerto Rico in the Caribbean, the Philippines, the Carolinas and the Marianas and the Palau in the Pacific), which turned out to be easy prey, due to the strong political crisis that shook its metropolis since the end of the reign of Isabella II.

In the case of Cuba, its strong economic, agricultural and strategic value had already provoked numerous purchase offers for the island by several American presidents (John Quincy Adams, James Polk, James Buchanan and Ulysses S. Grant), that the government Spanish always rejected. Cuba was not only a matter of prestige for Spain, but it was one of its richest territories and the commercial traffic of its capital, Havana, was comparable to that recorded at the same time in Barcelona.

To this was added the birth of national feeling in Cuba, which since the Revolution of 1868 had been gaining adherents, the birth of a local bourgeoisie and the political and commercial limitations imposed by Spain that did not allow the free exchange of products, mainly sugar from cane, with the USA and other powers. The benefits of the industrial and commercial bourgeoisie of Cuba were seriously affected by Spanish legislation. The pressures of the Catalan textile bourgeoisie had led to the enactment of the Law of Commercial Relations with the Antilles (1882) and the Canovas Tariff (1891), which guaranteed the monopoly of the textile of Barcelona by taxing foreign products with tariffs of 40% and 46%, and forcing to absorb the production surpluses. The extension of these privileges in the Cuban market settled the industrialization of the Catalan region during the crisis of the sector in the 1880s, nullifying its competitiveness problems, at of the interests of Cuban industry, which was an essential stimulus of the revolt.

The escalation of misgivings between the governments of the US and Spain was increasing, while in the press of both countries there were strong smear campaigns against the adversary. In the midst of this scenario of tension, there was the collapse of the USS Maine, for which the USA blamed Spain. This ended by unleashing the war.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jesus taught that everyone must give up all riches.<br><br> true or false
Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

“Money and possessions are the second most referenced topic in the Bible – money is mentioned more than 800 times – and the message is clear: Nowhere in Scripture is debt viewed in a positive way.”

7 0
3 years ago
Why are state constitutions important?
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

State constitutions perform an important role in the governance of America’s 320 Million citizens and play a critical role in making federalism work. We couldn’t get by without them. Gary Porter is Executive Director of the Constitution Leadership Initiative (CLI), a project to promote a better understanding of the U.S. Constitution by the American people.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Use the word “supply-side economic” in a sentence
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think the teachings of st. Augustine and st.Thomas Aquinas were important to people in the Middle Ages.
    7·1 answer
  • Which transportation development had the greatest long-term impact on the american economy
    13·1 answer
  • How did roads contribute to the empires success in rome
    6·1 answer
  • The Santa Fe Trail connected __________ with __________.
    10·2 answers
  • What impact have both Christianity and Judaism had on world history?
    11·2 answers
  • How has music change over the years?
    7·2 answers
  • I need the answer relatively quickly!
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone please answer this time. I cant remember names very well.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the army of Christ ​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!