1st. Tourism
2nd. Oil and Gas Production
Life goes on by oliver tree
Assuming a police psychologist diagnosed Samantha as being hyperactive, impulsive. She has a(n)<u> Antisocial</u> personality.
<h3>What is Antisocial personality?</h3>
Antisocial personality is a type of mental disorder that occur when a person is not remorseful after doing something bad.
A person with this type of personality are always aggressive and do not have empathy as do not care about people around them.
Therefore she has a(n)<u> Antisocial</u> personality.
Learn more about Antisocial personality here:brainly.com/question/25764595
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
