Answer:
The best answer to the question: Which sociological perspective would be most likely to argue that most talented people would not go to school for many years to become biochemists if they could make as much money and gain as much respect working as elevator operators, would be: 1) Funcionalist perspective.
Explanation:
The functionalist perspective, which derives from the philosophical ideals of Functionalism, is a sociological way to interpret how societies are formed, for what purpose, and how all elements of that society work together to function. It was grown from the works of many philosophers and other thinkers, but their most representative characters were Emile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons and Robert Merton. Basically, this perspective would define society as an interconnection between elements that work in synchronization to achieve an ultimate common goal which is social equilibrium and harmony. In this case, the perspective works to explain why people in a society would consider having a job of high performance, versus one that does not, but that through both they could achieve the same basic benefits, and still achieve society´s ultimate goals.
Answer:
Personal hunches
Explanation:
Personal hunches is not potentially useful when inventing lines of support for a causal argument.
This is because, an argument should have a logical premise and personal hunch is not logical, rather a feeling.
Mount Sunflower is the highest mountain in Kansas
Answer:
The correct statment would be: "the hormons of the endocrine system exert their action by lock and key mechanism."
Explanation:
The endoncrine system is responsable of the release of hormons under certain conditions, and in different organs, they go trough the bloodstream. The lock and key mechanism is explained as how the receptors block or release hormonos or instead they don´t. The endocrine system is responsable for the reproductive system, and regulates metabolic processes.
