A good conclusion in a research paper restates the hypothesis so that reader can see the value of argument which either defends or criticizes the hypothesis. If it's a long paper it's a good idea to restate the hypothesis in the conclusion. This reminds the user of the hypothesis and draws the paper together. It also revisits the hypothesis and can provide new insight into the hypothesis. Another reason for restating the hypothesis in the conclusion is to pose questions and open the door for future research.
Answer:
When magma cools underground, it cools very slowly and when lava cools above ground, it cools quickly. When magma and lava cool, mineral crystals start to form in the molten rock. Plutonic rocks, which cool slowly underground, have large crystals because the crystals had enough time to grow to a large size.
Explanation:
It basicly startes to molden the rock, and more.
The answer is the last one
<em>The botulinum toxin, a poison produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum (C. botulinum), is common in soil and exists in untreated water. It can survive in these environments as a resistant spore. Foodborne botulism is caused by consuming foods containing the botulinum toxin.</em>
