What was the most common form of taxation during the colonial era?

When janice went to work as a hair stylist in rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with rick whereby if she left sh

ASHA 777 [7]

The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;

When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?

The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "covenant not to compete".

It is hard to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important, the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions, as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.

3 0

3 years ago

Ashley Inc.’s total value is $950 million. Its balance sheet shows $100 million of accounts payable, $100 million of notes payab

PIT_PIT [208]

Answer: $7.50

Explanation:

Given that,

Total value = $950 million

Accounts payable = $100 million

Notes payable = $100 million

Long-term debt = $200 million

common equity = $200 million

shares of common stock = 100 million

Value of equity = Value of firm - Value of preferred stock - Value of long term debt.

= $950 million - 0 - $200 million

= $750 million

$Value\ of\ stock = \frac{Value\ of\ equity}{Number\ of\ shares}$

$Value\ of\ stock = \frac{750}{100}$

= $7.50

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following actions would likely raise life insurance premiums?

Dafna1 [17]

Living a non-smoker its b

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Alternative A Alternative B Materials costs $28,000 $64,000 Processing costs $34,000 $34,000 Equipment rental $11,000 $28,500 Oc

stira [4]

Answer:

$61,600

Explanation:

The differential cost analysis is an analysis in which the costs of two alternatives is taken into consideration and based on those costs it is decided that which alternative is suitable in terms of increment that has been lost by other alternative. That is why it is also known as alternative cost. To calculate the differential cost, it is simple, subtract the cost of 1st alternative from the 2nd and you will get the differential cost. Basically this tool helps in decision making when deciding to choose between two alternatives.

In the question we have been asked to find the differential cost of Alternative B over Alternative A, including all of the relevant costs. To do that first we need to find the differential costs among all the relevant costs and then sum all the differences to find the differential cost of Alternative B over Alternative A.

(a)

Differential Cost of Alternative B over Alternative A is;

Materials costs = $64,000 - $28,000 = $36,000

Processing costs = $34,000 - $34,000 = $0

Equipment rental = $28,500 - $11,000 = $17,500

Occupancy costs = $27,600 - $19,500 = $8,100

(b)

Now the Total Cost which is Differential Cost of Alternative B over Alternative A is;

$36,000 + $0 + $17,500 + $8,100

$61,600

6 0

2 years ago

After the federal government stepped in to keep some businesses from failing, new attention was focused on executive compensatio

olganol [36]

Answer:

lets look at the options and find the correct one!

obviously technology is not related to this at all. so we can cut it off.

Operations is not applicable as an answer as well. it doesn't seem to fit in.

Structure and executive pay are two different things so nope! not that one!

d. people this option is a bit confusing so lets keep it for now.

e. social responsibility seems like fits in too as the government money saves these companies, the companies have a responsibility to have a fair pay towards their executives.

but as the question asks "example of an organization change attempt focused on influencing", in my view the most suitable one would be PEOPLE since the Politicians, tax payers and news media are all trying to do this by influencing people.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago