That's a lot of questions! You need not give me the "brainliest," as I may only respond to a couple of those points for the sake of time here.
#2 in your list: In Lincoln's first inaugural address, he said: "Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy." In other words, if states could choose to secede from the union, then there was really no union and no government. (Anarchy is the absence of government.) Only if we abide by the constitutional checks we place on ourselves in a democratic republic are we exercising genuine government. Otherwise, we fall into chaos or some sort of dictatorial state. Lincoln felt that the whole concept of self-government was at stake, threatened by the South's desire to secede. Lincoln had to treat the secession of several states as an act of rebellion.
#5 in your list (closely related to #2): The states that had seceded already had caused the civil war, in Lincoln's estimation. The northern states had to respond to hold the union together. The southern states claimed to be afraid for their property, peace and safety with an administration like Lincoln's in charge. But Lincoln saw those fears as unfounded, that all states would continue to enjoy their constitutional privileges. But seceding from the union cut them off from all stability and security.
Answer:
a.
a self-propelled engine, powered by steam, diesel, or electricity, for pulling or, sometimes, pushing.
Answer:
Slavery in the West
Explanation:
Slavery is closely relating from the first half of the 19th century in the westward movement, territorial expansion, and the frontier. The nation increased by adding new territories excessively until it reached the Pacific Ocean in the 1840s. In the west, slavery carried for the economic and social processes. The westward expansion took slavery in Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, and Texas.
In the South, slave owners demanded slavery because, without it, there was no growth in the country. Slaves used as labour in the plantations and domestic work.
It was "Francois Rabelais" who wrote the humorous novel Pantagruel, published in 1532, which poked fun at the established order, since this was during a time when many voices of "protest" made their way through literary works such as this.