The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.
<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>
Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.
Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.
They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.
Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.
#SPJ1
Drawing rooms, hostesses held regular social gatherings
Answer:
<em>water</em><em> </em><em>rout</em><em>e</em>
Explanation:
The Romans would have been more likely to choose a water route to Spain. A water route would have been much shorter, and stops restock supplies could have been made at Sardinia and other islands along the way.
I hope this helps you
Answer:
Many men became rich and brought their families, leading to bustling towns of successful small business owners. Mining towns did well with little regulation from the government, leading to the establishment of more independent towns in the West.
Answer:
The answer is "Option A"
Explanation:
In the given question numbering of the choices were missing, which is defined in the attached file please find it.
In the question, only choice A is correct because of the agricultural existence or dependency of medieval European country currency upon forced labor, and wrong choices can be defined as follows:
- The reluctance of aristocracy leaders as well as other royal families with their staff and servants are not taken direct legal proceedings.
- It's not a high economic and social role with plowmen in the English traditional period.
- It is not the existence of alliance laws that require farmworkers from working for more than several hours per week.
