If your options are: a) The competing interests of the people were institutionalized in the Estates General, generating a "reciprocal struggle" that would reconcile discordant powers, b) The monarchy, though occasionally unjust, provided stability and security, <span>c) The "discordant interests" of the various corporate bodies of France— the guilds, municipalities, nobility, and </span>
clergy— were mediated by the monarch and his officials, and <span>d) All of the above, the correct answer in my opinion is d) All of the above. Burke provides a comprehensive critique of the French revolution in all of its aspects. Even though he admits it was a remarkable event, he disagrees that it would bring about a new, more just and sound political system. Of course, the old monarchy was bad in many respects, but it didn't have to be abolished altogether. It could be fixed. Instead, monarchy was replaced by anarchy and traditions were violently dismantled.</span>
Answer:
Democracy is a way of governing (like a dictatorship, republic, monarchy) and socialism is an economic system or how a society maintains and distributes wealth (like capitalism, communism). It is the difference between a power dynamic as opposed to an economic one.
I believe they would say howdy Pailface
Pailface derives from the word Paleface that commonly used by The indian etchnicity.
The word is most comonly used as a slur from the Indians to describe White skinned people that they do not like.
