The allied powers used land as their mail gorund to fight on while the germans used the sea as a sneek attack bc the allied powers didn't see it coming that is how the ussr was sank bc of a surpisre attack from the Germans .
People give different versions of the same story as they want. The Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account is important as His first-hand account contradicts the denial.
The Ottoman government in 1916 was known to have massacres a lot of people.
The Armenian genocide denial was a big case in the world. The claim made by the Ottoman Empire and the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) was that they had no hand in the genocide against the Armenian people during World War I.
This was a very big crime that has a lot of documentation on the numbers of evidences to prove their guilt but they still won't accept that they committed it.
See full question below
Considering that the Ottoman government denied any orders or mass killings, why is Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account important?
A. His first-hand account supports the Ottoman government
B. His first-hand account contradicts this denial
C. He had recovered old documents that support the Ottoman government
D. He had recovered old documents that contradict this denial
Learn more about Ottoman government from
brainly.com/question/25798424
The correct answer is Option B and C
B. they helped maintain order in society
and
C. he mediated disagreements over business contracts
The Code of Hammurabi is an ancient and well preserved code of law from the times of Mesopotamia Empire dated close to 1754 B.C.
It is named after the Babylonian King, Hammurabi and it is found on a piece of large stone slab.
The factors that led to the surprise strategic attack of Pearl Harbor was due to many reasons, among which the Japanese imperialistic tendencies were the most obvious one. The Japanese really wanted to have control over those portions of the Pacific which is also the reason why they attacked Pearl Harbor.
Roman society was one that constantly pushed romans to be more and more ambitious, to take more, do more and conquer more. Eventually you start stepping on people's toes who are trying to do the same thing, then you have two powerful people fighting for ultimate power (ceaser v. pompey, sulla v. marius, augustus v. marc anthony, etc.). Then there was the Marian reforms which made soldiers beholdened primarily to their general, not the state, for their rewards (usually land after the campaign was finished), couple that with legions frequently going further and further from Rome in the late republic, most Roman soldiers knew and depended on their general, and barely interacted with the state at all. So these generals gradually gained ferociously loyal armies that were closer to them than Rome in general, so they'd be pretty willing to fight for their general against another general, even when it would weaken the state as a whole. Obviously civil wars cause a huge amount of damage to their nation, both in lives and monetary cost. Plus usually whoever won the civil war would then proceed to kill all prominent citizens who even slightly leaned toward the opposing side. After two or three purges like this, many of the prominent families that made rome into a world power were completely in shambles and the bitter rivalries between them made future wars inevitable.
