Answer:
Explanation:
To share a brief understanding of experts, who is an expert, an expert is considered, someone who has enough experience to carry put a particular task, he or she understands the possible scenarios and problems that might likely affect a system. While a non expert is someone, not that he doesn't understand the system, he might but not in details ,not enough experience unlike am expert.
So from the above analogy between experts and non experts ,it can be deduced that the method and approach to work from an expert will be more detailed because the possible scenarios of the task, he very much understands it buh a non expert, thou he might understand the task , but the approach to the system might be difference. An expert will potentially go straight to the point of the task, and even before starting the task already has a full knowledge of the problem compared to am non expert that might nor have a general knowledge of the task buh approaching the task with just confidence of previous works related to such task. I believe from the few points I have been able to point out the differences between an expert and non expert.
This would be a perfect example of the system of barter as you are trading one book for the other. You can see from here what barter is, a trading system which involves direct exchange of goods without some kind of medium of exchange, for example money. Services can also be traded this way.
Judicial review is when the judicial branch reviews the other branches for their choices.
I think the answer is E
Hope I helped
