Answer:
C. Happy people are more likely to send a lot of tweets than sad people
Explanation:
- If the researcher wants to find out the relationships between the tweets and the happiness of the people and he comes to a conclusion that a positive correlation exists as the number of the people that are happier are more likely to send more tweets than those of the sad people and thus concluded that a strong correlation exists when people give more tweets are considered or reported to be happy.
Answer:
Socially or economically disadvantaged subjects should be excluded from research protocols that are not designed specifically for them, Option A.
Explanation:
A 'vulnerable population' is a group of individuals who need greater protection than the normal individuals in case they participate in a research, because a research may require include some risks. This type of population includes pregnant women, neonates, children, economically pr socially disadvantaged. Even who are terminally ill are included in such type of population.
They should not be included in research that are not meant specifically for them. They should not included by paying them a nominal amount or for phase 1 as stated in other options.
Answer:
feel more effective.
Explanation:
In general sense, small groups are defined as group of people mostly three or a few more people, but not in large numbers (above twenty) who are together to achieve a common goal. For example, a group of talented guys, that forms a musical group for the purpose of realizing their musical or artistical dreams.
Some of the characteristics of small groups includes:
1. Shared identity
2. Results oriented approach
3. Interdependece
4. Competent team members
Hence, in comparison with the large groups, people in small groups tend to identify themselves with the core structures and goals of the group, there by less likely to take more than their equal share of available resources, which in turn makes them to FEEL MORE EFFECTIVE in general towards the success of the group.
B at the start of a summary
Answer: He lacked the specific intent necessary for burglary because he believed that the bookie owed him the money.
Explanation:
Gambling can turn out sour sometimes, especially when results come out controversial. Although the defendant is not supposed to break into someone's home but according to the common law burglary he has some defense to make for himself which is he believed that the bookie owed him the money that's what he based his action for. The definition of common law burglary requires that the defendant break into the dwelling place with the intent to commit a felony. He would claim he didn't destroy any item or take more than what He was owed but just stocked to taking the money he was owed.
