The idea of being at the "bottom" is one derived from the concept of social hierarchy. In a social hierarchy, certain groups in society are considered valuable and admired (at the top) while others are often ignored, abused, or rejected (at the bottom). In our society, this is usually related to the socio-economic position an individual has. Therefore, people at the "bottom" can often feel "invisible." They feel that the government, as well as social institutions, care little about their interests and needs.
Tammy Crabtree can be seen as an example of this. She is likely to feel invisible, as very few people care about her plight. She works far from her house, for a very low wage, and feels unable to improve her future.
Answer:
England planted its first successful North American colony at Jamestown in 1607, but settlers fought Indians and disease, and the colony grew slowly.
Explanation:
Answer:
Decrease
Explanation:
Eating behavior started in the first year of a child. Children learn directly how to eat, how much eat and what to eat. At the infancy, stage parents are more conscious about the food of their children.
What should eat and what not? But as the children grew up parents get lenient towards their diet. So children get leniency related to their dietary chart. So they start to eat junk food, fast food, etc. This type of food is harmful to their body. It is not healthy for their growth and development. Junk food has non-nutritious. So it creates a lot of problem with children.
Answer:
64 pi
Explanation:
Area of circle = Pi X R^2
Diameter is double the radius so you have it.
16/2 = 8
Pi X 8^2
8^2 = 64
64 Pi
(In terms of pi simply means work out the answer and add pi to the end)
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
