<u>Explanation:</u>
First, remember that the difference between <em>normative and positive economic analysis</em> is that;
Normative analysis take a somewhat neutral view by stating how the world should be. While
The Positive analysis states the facts. That is, it describes the world as it is.
<u>
Thus, a </u><u>Normative analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
c. In some cities such as San Francisco and New York, it would be impossible for low−skilled workers to live comfortably in the city without minimum wage laws.
d. The gains to winners of a minimum wage law should be valued more highly than the losses to losers because the latter primarily comprises businesses.
<u>And a </u><u>Positive analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
a. The minimum wage law causes unemployment.
b. A minimum wage law benefits some groups and hurts others.
Answer:
The answer might be option no C
I think it could either be the first or third option, but I thinking the correct one should be the first option. Hope this helped :)
Answer:
$532.24
Explanation:
Since Mr. Wise will be making monthly payments for the period of 25 years in order to accumulated the $1,000,000 at the end of 25 years, therefore, the future value of annuity shall be used to determine the monthly payments to be deposited by Mr Wise. The formula of future value of annuity is given as follows:
Future value of annuity=R[((1+i)^n-1)/i]
In the given scenario:
Future value of annuity=amount after 25 years=$1,000.000
R=monthly payments to be deposited by Mr Wise=?
i=interest rate per month=12/12=1%
n=number of payments involved=25*12=300
$1,000,000=R[((1+1%)^300-1)/1%]
R=$532.24
Answer:
because they just are buddy
