The answer is: Angel investor
Angel investors only injected their capital with the businesses if they believe that the leaders are capable in making the decision by their own.
This hands-off approach in investments tend to be reall risky. But Angel investors tend to be wealthy enough to the point where they can afford the financial blow back even if a couple of their start up investments fail.
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
Disruptive innovation.
Explanation:
Disruptive innovation is one that creates the way a market operates, that is it creates a new market and disrupts the old one. Existing firms and products are displaced.
In this instance when Futura Inc. introduced an automobile that could run completely on electricity for longer periods of time than any other electronic or hybrid automobile, it introduced a product that will cause disruptions in the current automobile industry.
Although there was challenges of frequent repairs, this was eventually resolved.