Answer:
Explanation:
Transaction details encompasses all of the details comprises within a single business procedure or unit of work, its main purpose is to brace the performing of day to day operational or structured conclusions.
Answer: charge a monopoly price
Explanation:
Patents provide an exclusive right to the firm in the production and sale of a drug. This provides the firm exclusive market power to decide the price and the quantity and therefore the firm is able to charge a monopoly price and also earn monopoly profits.
When an existing patent expires and the generic producers enter the market, the price reduces due to an increase in the supply of the erstwhile patented drug. This will reduce the monopoly profit of incumbent producers. Therefore, they will seek to deter the entry of generic drug makers in order to safeguard their monopoly profits and price.
Therefore, incumbents were willing to give enough to potential entrants so as to make them delay entry to charge a monopoly price.
The effect of the 2013 Supreme Court decision allowing legal action against these companies is increase in the cost of pay-for-delay agreements and also reduce incumbent profits from these agreements.
Answer:
The investment adviser first buys the shares for its customer accounts and then places the order necessary to buy the shares for its proprietary account
Explanation:
Since buying a large position for the adviser's customers might tend to push the price of the stock up, the adviser cannot benefit from this by "front running" the customer orders by placing an order to buy the stock for its proprietary account just before placing the big customer orders to buy. The best procedure is to buy the stock for the customers first and then for the adviser's proprietary account. Remember that the adviser is a fiduciary who must place his clients' interests first.
Answer: Yes, in light of the fact that the dumping practices pose a serious (and credible) threat, she does have a prima facie obligation to blow the whistle
Explanation:
Helen has the right to blow the whistle because engineers in well protected society for whistle blowing can have legal and moral support if they disclose some irregularity and corruption in their industry. In denial of not making known the decadence in the industry exposes individuals who work there and the society at large to a risk. Safety is a primary factor in any industry and whatever isn't done well or in the right manner is a danger to everyone
