Question

2. Which concepts from the text are most convincing to you? Which do you find less convincing? Overall, do you agree with Carl Rogers' analysis of how we view and understand ourselves? Why or why not? Use evidence from this text, your own experience, and other art, literature, or history in your answer

Answer 1

The question requires a personal answer, about your interpretation of the text. In that case, I can't write your answer, but I'll show you how to do it.

Your question refers to the text "auto-concept" written by Saul McLeod. In this case, the first step to answering this question is to read this text and understand the concepts presented in it.

The text presents the three components of the self-concept and how they are established in an individual's life and his/her perception of himself or herself.

These components were explained by Carl Rogers as self-image, self-esteem, and the ideal self.

O que os componentes da autoimagem representam?

• Self-image: The view that the individual has of himself.
• Self-esteem: The value that the individual gives to himself.
• Ideal Self: The way the individual would like to be.

In this case, to answer your questions, you must decide which of these components is more convincing and less convincing for your interpretation of the text.

In addition, you must determine whether Carl Roger's conceptualization of these components is effective.

Learn more about Carl Roger at the link:

brainly.com/question/14018413