Answer:
The correct answer is Option "b. The value of the currency would increase"
Explanation:
The government through the central bank can adopt a variety of measures to control the amount of money supply in the economy. The state uses a combination of monetary and fiscal policies to this effect.
In the given example, the federal government would not print more money due to the implications it has not only on the value of the currency but also on other macroeconomic variables such as interest rates and inflation.
By printing money, there would be an excess amount of money supply in the economy. That would make each dollar in the economy worth less than what it was before. This puts downward pressure on interest rates and boosts inflation as well.
Due to higher inflation, a greater amount of money would be required to continue with normal business which would again cause the need to further increase money supply. Using the law of simple demand and supply, the value of money would keep lowering as money supply is kept increasing. This is why a government might elect to not print money.
Answer:
b. panic Disorder (without agoraphobia).
Explanation:
Panic disorder: The panic disorder is distinguished as unexpected and recurring panic attacks accompanying one month of either fret about consequences of the attacks or the future attacks as well as the specific changes in behavior because of the attack.
Agoraphobia in the absence of a history related to panic disorder is defined as an anxiety disorder in which the person dealing with the disorder doesn't meet the DSM-5 criteria for panic disorder. Agoraphobia is also referred to as the primary agoraphobia. However, in a few cases, agoraphobia can occur without the presence of panic attacks.
the supreme court was to consist of a chief justice and 5 associate justices. then a federal judge was to preside over a United States district court which would hear admiralty and maritime cases and some other minor cases. Then the middle tier of the judiciary consisted of the United States circuit courts, which would serve as the principal trial courts in the federal system and exercise limited appellate jurisdiction. Two Supreme court justices and local district judge were to preside in circuit courts
The answer is "False".
These sort of business with patriarchal and very strict hierarchical powers, usually exercise a very authoritarian and old-fashioned type of leardership. Decisions are made only by the directives and cannot be questioned but only obbeyed, and is much more likely that these are only driven by pure profit maximization, without taking into account possible negative externalities that their business exploitation can be generating for the rest of the society.
