New evidence is discovered & Oversights and errors are corrected
Thats what i personally think because new opinions have to be backed with evidence, while if a piece of evidence is lost or stolen, it doesn't change the arguments because even though it is lost or stolen, there ought to be copies of the original object, but im not sure about new technology being applied to evidence, but it can go either or, its a 50/50 because new technology can enhance historical discoveries, or find new ones, but applying new technology as evidence has to be backed up with facts as to why it should be applied
The case of a resident accused of violating traffic laws would most likely be heard by the city or county court. The correct option among all of the options that are given in the question is the second option. A county court is a court that has the jurisdiction covering more than one counties. It is different from the medieval county courts that were held by High sheriffs of a county.
Hello back to you:)
ok, so the magna carta was very important for the whole development of parliament. First of all it asserted a fundamental principle that taxation needed the consent of the kingdom.
Secondly, it made taxation absolutely necessary for the king because it stopped up so many sources of revenue.
have a good day
Answer:
Hey there!
I'm pretty sure the answer is "Neither had a clear winner."
Hope this helps :)
