Answer:
An example of how language can be divisive is the dominance of French in Quebec and English in the rest of Canada.
Explanation:
A is not correct because it simply describes a family of closely related languages, which is unifying more often than not, not the other way around.
B is not correct because this statement is not true, as the United States, as all countries in the world, has official language/s.
C is correct because here we have a situation where within one country there are two dominant languages, and the people also use them in order to distinguish themselves from the others, causing tensions in the process, as well as movements toward separation.
D is not correct because such a thing may or may not be problematic, as we do have examples of both around the world.
Japanese archipelago or the Japan Sea
Murray River is in eastern aus
Since the proof for x = 30, the missing reason in step 3 is known to be angle addition postulate.
<h3>What is angle addition postulate?</h3>
This is known to be the law that state that when one put two or more angles side by side making them to share a common vertex and also an arm between the both pair of angles, then the sum of those angles will then be the same with the total sum of the resulting angle.
Since T = is the interior of straight angle ∠VRS.
m∠VRS = 180° ( is a straight line angle)
So, based on the angle addition postulate says that:
m∠TRS + m∠TRV = 180°.
Therefore, since the proof for x = 30, the missing reason in step 3 is angle addition postulate.
Learn more about angle addition postulate from
brainly.com/question/24782727
#SPJ1
B because that is we’re the president is I’m sorry this might not be right