1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
1 year ago
14

Analyze the state of democracy in the united states today. In your opinion, is American democracy at risk or functioning as it s

hould?
History
1 answer:
Volgvan1 year ago
8 0
I think American democracy is still at risk due current events were not out the forest yet but we’re pretty close into falling into a dictatorship
You might be interested in
Samuel Adams, and his idea of state rights, was supported by the party of?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:the new nation

Those who did not support the Constitution came to be known as Anti-Federalists or ‘states-rights men’ and their most notable representative was Patrick Henry (who had refused to attend the Convention because of his suspicion of it, declaring “I smell a rat, tending toward monarchy

Others included George Clinton, Richard Henry Lee and Mercy Otis Warren, the female chronicler. Thomas Jefferson was also sharply critical of the Constitution, though he actively supported some parts of it, and later explained that he was not fully Anti-Federalist but somewhere between the two positions.

As a group, Anti-Federalists were concerned about several issues. They feared that sovereignty, autonomy and states’ rights would be trampled by the newly-empowered national government. They argued that over time the power and influence of the states would be eroded or ‘drained’ by the federal government. They worried that the centralisation of power would put control into the hands of an urban-based elite. They expressed concern that the president, with control of the army, might become a military dictator (“[the presidency] would be a foetus of monarchy!” said Edmund Randolph). They feared the separation of powers in the Constitution was not strong enough or distinct enough. They panicked about the possible implications for personal liberties like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and the right to worship freely, which to many Americans had been the real driving issue behind the revolution.

A historian’s view:

“The basic concept stressed [in many anti-Federalist works] was the evil effect of power. ‘The love of power is natural… it is insatiable…’ wrote Burgh. ‘Power renders men wanton, insolent to others and fond of themselves,’ observed Gordon and Trenchard… This mistrust of power was characteristic of American political thought during this period.”

Unlike their opposition, the Anti-Federalists did not engage in a coordinated and sustained propaganda barrage. While the Federalist Papers appeared as 85 single editions, published regularly and with clear arguments and tone, the Anti-Federalists wrote sporadically, using pseudonyms such as Cato, Federal Farmer  Centinel and Brutus. The quality of their pamphlets did not approach those of the Federalists. Intellectually outgunned and lacking a figurehead leader such as Washington, the Anti-Federalists were not able to convince enough of their cause, though they enjoyed plenty of support, particularly in the larger states and in the south. Some Americans saw the flaws in both sides and supported neither the federalist or anti-federalist points-of-view. The picture above, The Looking Glass for 1787: A House Divided against itself cannot Stand, shows the two camps pulling the state of Connecticut apart with their constant bickering and equivocation.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
The spanish encomienda was ___
Dominik [7]

Answer:

Encomienda, in colonial Spanish America, was a legal system by which the Spanish crown attempted to define the status of the Indian population in its American colonies. It was based upon the practice of exacting tribute from Muslims and Jews during the Reconquista (“Reconquest”) of Muslim Spain.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone plz help me?
kykrilka [37]

One of history's first true super powers, the Persian Empire stretched from the borders of India down through Egypt and up to the northern borders of Greece. But Persia's rule as a dominant empire would finally be brought to an end by a brilliant military and political strategist, Alexander the Great.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are five strengths of the article of confederation?
Ipatiy [6.2K]
The major downfall of the Articles of Confederation<span>was simply </span>weakness<span>. The federal government, under the </span>Articles<span>, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. The Continental Congress had borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War and could not repay their debts.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
How did the repeal of the Missouri Compromise affect Kansas?
stira [4]

Answer:

The repeal of the commitment to Missouri affected Kansas because it allowed for an open conflict between abolitionists and slaveholders.

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise, also called the 1820 Commitments, was an agreement passed in 1820 between pro-slavery and pro-abolitionist groups in the United States of America, primarily involving the regulation of slave labor in the western territories.

In 1850, the Missouri Compromise goes into crisis. California wanted to enter the Union as a free state, but it was located south of the parallel of 36 ° 30 '- that is, between the slave states. The war seemed close, but then a new agreement emerged: California was admitted with a free state, the other free states were forced to repatriate fugitive slaves, and New Mexico and Utah gained bylaws of territories and not states, that is, without own laws against or in favor of slavery.

The definitive crisis of the Missouri Compromise occurred in 1854 with the Kansas-Nebraska bill, authored by Douglas Douglas of Ilhinóis. Douglas proposed the Organization of Kansas and Nebraska as territories with freedom of choice, by popular decision, between being or not slave state. And as I encouraged the occupation, Douglas suggested that the railroad, still under construction, cut off the two territories. Congress passed the propositions, nullifying the Missouri Compromise. The confrontation between free states and slave states became then open and declared.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement best explains the effect of international trade on American industries?
    15·2 answers
  • This series of articles was written in 1787 urging Americans to oppose the ratification of the proposed United States Constituti
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Hundred Years War impact people in the Middle Ages?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the Vikings?
    5·2 answers
  • Does military conflict and war strengthen our democracy or weaken a democracy?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Roaring '20s mark the end of the Progressive Era?
    14·1 answer
  • What was different about warfare in the early 1800s and early 1900s? Please explain.
    10·1 answer
  • Who controlled the Silk Road and Mediterranean Trade with China?
    14·1 answer
  • "Terminus" means end of the line. Atlanta's original name was Terminus. Why would Atlanta have a connection to the meaning end o
    5·1 answer
  • Are you taken? but t is silent?​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!