Hey!
This is obviously known as short-term memory. We know it is not long-term, as it would not have been forgotten as quickly. Implicit memory has to do with the unconscious recollection of information, so we know that one is not correct, and explicit memory is the conscious recollection of information. While they are both types of long-term memory, the best answer to this problem is a. long-term.
Answer:
Personal experiences and memory of the author.
Explanation:
Prewriting is the germinal phase of the writing process. It includes five basic strategies which are also called "brainstorming strategies" which include listing, clustering, freewriting, looping and asking the journalists which may be based on several topics like illustrations, statistics, literature, etc. But prewriting strategies for autobiographical writing is often associated with the author's personal experiences and memory. It helps him/her exemplify their perceptions or viewpoint to the readers. An autobiographical prewriting focuses on the gathering and arranging the information of the major events and happenings of the author's life and its consequences to present it to the readers in a more relative and effective manner.
That is not up to us that is up to you
Answer:
<em>Noun.</em>
Explanation:
First we need to remember that adjectives are parts of speech which stand beside a noun and modify it. ( for example: big city)
Adjective clause is a type of a dependent clause that consist of a relative pronoun (which connects clause with the word we are describing), subject and a verb - they all together serve as an adjective. So, just like adjectives, they also modifies nouns.
E.g. The cookies <em>that my Grandma bakes</em> are very tasty.
The Dust Bowl was a period in the thirties when severe dust storms devastated all crops and other ecological components in several American and Canadian soils. This was partly caused by drought as well as the farmers' improper practices.
Because at least a year's worth of crops were gone, the bank cannot buy them and there would be no way for the value of their crops to increase either. Also, they would not be aiming to covet each other's land since most of the land eroded that period, too.
As a consequence for farmers, the government took their land. This was also done by the government in an effort to mitigate the damages done to the areas.
ANSWER: A.