Answer:
yes because it is telling us to fight for for the wrong.
Explanation:
Answer:
On September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks carried out against the United States would become the catalyst for at least two wars, dozens of new pieces of legislation, the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, and a slew of court cases that would test the boundaries of the Constitution as the nation struggled to find a sense of safety in the post-9/11 world.
Here’s a look at some of the most impactful constitutional cases decided and questions that were posed as a result of 9/11 and the War on Terror.
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)
This Supreme Court case arose from the detainment of Yaser Hamdi, a U.S. citizen captured in Afghanistan by the U.S. military in 2001. He was declared to be an “enemy combatant” fighting for the Taliban and was sent to the military prison at Guantanamo Bay for indefinite detainment. When it was discovered that he was a U.S. citizen, he was transferred to a military prison in Virginia and his father petitioned the court for his release.
Explanation:
please give me a brainliest
Child labor
I hope it helped
Answer:
As a Dictator
Explanation:
Much of the rest of the world would come to see Stalin as strict. The exception is the US during WW2, in which Stalin was a useful asset to the American in the fight for europe. Of course, a city was named from him and he introduced many laws restricting the arts ("to prevent information leaks"), which made many countries suspicious.
The major campaign issue in the 1928 Election was, Religion and Prohibition.
Sooo I believe your answer is b.
