How do the fallacies in the first passage differ from the fallacies in the second?
Explanation:
Passage 1 contains an ad hominem attack, while passage 2 contains a false dilemma. ... Passage 1 contains an appeal to emotion, while passage 2 contains an ad hominem attack.
This is an example of dramatic irony because Helena doesn't know that the men who despise her are bewitched, but the public knows it.
<h3>What is tragic irony?</h3>
- It is a literary resource.
- It is the way to separate the conviction of the audience and the character.
- It is a way of showing a situation that the reader is aware of and the character is not.
When she talks about the companions that detest her, she is referring to the contempt she is receiving from the men who have accompanied her. However, this contempt is not real, as men are bewitched and manipulated to despise her.
Although the reader knows this, Helena does not, and therefore, this is an example of dramatic irony.
More information about dramatic irony at the link:
brainly.com/question/26411865
The passover seder is a jewish ritual feast that marks the beginning of the jewish holiday of the passover.
Hope this helps!!
~S.T.S~
