The poem "Ozymandias" written by Percy Busshe speaks in a traditional, simple manner how much the human aspiration to their power and material achievements and wealth provides for themselves an eternity. Thinking that their material, earthly power is immortal, tells how much they cheat themselves, in the inability to understand what is eternal. Even the Ozymandias's statue, which is material and transient, is decaying, more durable than them.
The answer is: C.
I'm Not Sure, But I Think That It Is B. I'd Wait For Other People To Answer.
More cost effective, well known and are many fast food places anywhere and everywhere, well it is fast, often these days younger people go out like teens so they like going to affordable places, good food deals, they offer like things for getting their food like hjs offers glasses and maccas does monopoly, also places like maccas do partnerships with celebs so they become even more popular
Answer: Individual athletes play a key role in creating a positive team environment.
Explanation: Tells the reader that it is something they can do
Charles Darwin's natural selection theory holds that "<em>only the fittest species will survive the competition for scarce resources"</em>. <em>At a time when Darwinism dominated evolutionary theory, Jack London lets it reflect as a major theme in his "The call of the Wild". </em>
The link between both pieces of writing is seen through the journey of transformation followed by the main character Buck, <em>a St. Bernard dog</em>, from being a domesticated pet, past his getting trafficked as a sled dog, and into becoming the fiercest pack leader.
Mid chapter III in the book, Buck finally opposes the original pack leader,<em> Spitz,</em> to death as London narrates <em>"It was inevitable that the clash for leadership should come. Buck wanted it. He wanted it because it was his nature"</em>. Spitz finally dead, Buck stands <em>"the successful champion, the dominant primordial beast who had made his kill and found it good."</em>
Current evolutionary theory counters Darwin's stating that <em>what determines survival is not superiority but rather the ability to adapt to surrounding conditions or survive dramatic change in the environment</em>.
In any case, I believe Buck is a great example of the drive for adaptation in a living creature, which doesn't necessarily imply progress but retrogression under unfortunate enough circumstances.
