It is an interesting question but it is necessary to contextualize it.
First of all, hebrew is any member of ancient northern semitic people that were ancestors of the Jews, this definition is according Britannica Book.
But if I Have to mention the Bible the Hebrews was the Town of God defined in the Antique Testament and they had roles and commandments from God to follow. They had a sacerdote or lead who always talked with God and after communicated the messages for the People. One different from the people around them was that they can not eat murder animals and don't get idols of wood or someone else.
Now if we does check the new testament, the hebrews just believed in the Law of Moses and it was very different of pharisees, sadducees and son of them didn't believe in Jesus Christ.
Nowadays these different of doctrine about God are alive and they have produced serious conflict between nations and people.
Alea iacta est ("The die is cast") is a variation of a Latin phrase (iacta alea est) attributed by Suetonius to Julius Caesar who pronounced it in the year 49 B.C. when he was leading his army across the Rubicon river in the current territories of Northern Italy. Subsequently, he entered in Italy heading his army and defying the Roman Senate and it meant the beginning of the civil war versus Pompey and the Optimates.
- Plutarch, referred to the same event in his written testimonies and reported the phrase but stating it was pronounced in Greek instead of Latin and that its translation meant: <em>'Let the die be cast'.</em>
- Suetonius described the same situation, reporting a very similar phrase but not exactly the same. Let's include the exact excerpt of his writings where he did so.
<em>Caesar: '... iacta alea est,' inquit.</em>
<em>Caesar said, "The die has been cast."</em>
Thefore there are two very similar versions of the same historical events. Usually the Latin version is the most widely known, as the Latin language was more widespread all over Europe and gave rise to all the current family of Latin languages (Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, etc).
It failed because either the change did not work well in many business settings, or it was inefficient (due to the inefficiency of the conveyer-belt system). A more accurate reason is that the circuits couldn't handle the traffic during peak hour. The customer's orders were regularly mixed up. The conveyer-belt system was not fast enough or efficient enough to handle it.
Answer:
Risk of fire, lack of running water, potential for diseases to spread, inability to remove trash, lack of sanitation.
Explanation:
I meant C
Should be nation(s).
Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia.
