1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alina1380 [7]
4 years ago
8

The conquistador responsible for taking over the city of Tenochtitlán was ___

History
1 answer:
Roman55 [17]4 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is Hernán Cortes.

Hernan Cortes (1485-1547) was a Spanish <em>Conquistador (</em>or conqueror) who led the forces which caused the fall of the Aztec Empire and its capital, the city of Tenochtitlán. The siege and fall of this city took place in 1521, after systematic manipulations of the local forces and due to very valuable informants such as La Malinche. She was an indigenous woman who became the interpreter and companion of Hernan Cortes and revealed crucial information to him.  

You might be interested in
Which of the following was the major effect of the Armenian genocide?
Harrizon [31]

The correct answer is: D) Over one million people were persecuted and killed.

The Armenian Genocide took place in the Ottoman Empire from srping 1915 through autumn 1916 under the Young Turk government. It refers to the deportation and mass killing campaign against the Armenians living there. It is estimated that aproximately 1.5 million Armenians populated that region before the genocide, at least 664,00, to 1.2 million were killed. It is important to say that the main objective of the government was to destroy the whole armenian population, that is the reason it is called a genocide.

Some survivors reached the desert of Syria living in concentration camps starving to death and being massacred until 1916.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls help me get the answers to number 13 and 14
Tpy6a [65]

13. C algae helps the ocean

14. A makes the most sense

3 0
3 years ago
Andrew Jackson Writing Piece
klio [65]
After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.

When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation
8 0
3 years ago
On March 13, 1868, which President was the first to be attempted to be impeached? How many senators had to approve in order to h
inysia [295]
The President's name was Andrew Johnson! In order to have him impeached the Senate had to be two-thirds majority! The vote was 35-19 to impeach him they were only lacking 1 single vote!

I hope I helped! :)
7 0
3 years ago
The East India Company had a strong authority over many parts of India and had a monopoly over many Indian industries and trade
Sati [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

they had a monopoly over the spice trade and eventually brought british imperial rule to india

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During and after World War ll, what happened to the government’s economic role?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was Vespucci voyage undertaken
    12·1 answer
  • What was one way American colonists resisted British policies before the American revolution
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an effect of nativism in the United States in the 1920s?
    7·1 answer
  • Serves as most of the Georgia-South Carolina boundary
    5·2 answers
  • The Slave Trade-Export Compromise did all of the following Except: Select one: a. required all treaties to be ratified by two-th
    13·1 answer
  • NEED ASAP 7TH GRADE.
    15·2 answers
  • What happened last?
    13·1 answer
  • According to this chart, you can determine that A) New Zealand is no longer democratic B)democracies around the world are failin
    7·1 answer
  • Pls help!!! asap!!! Which statement describes how the second Great Awakening promoted social reform movements?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!