1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
6

A 2012 conference in p'yŏngyang reviewed plans to restore the environment and ________ in north korea.

History
1 answer:
frosja888 [35]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is increase in food security. The threats to food security and agricultural sustainability are the following: drought, food protection, power disruption, economics, terrorism, chemical pollutants, genetic pollutants, impacts on pollinators, soil erosion, climate alternate, and so forth.
You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!
iogann1982 [59]

American militia fighting on their own soil was arguably the largest technical factor in them winning the war. Americans knew the land they fought on, and therefore knew the best routes to take for supplies, troop movements, and where the British may have been hiding. American militias hired <em>frontiersmen</em>, men who had grown up in the woods and knew how to hunt and travel in them, to fight on their side of the war. This allowed for a huge advantage over the British in the ground battles of the war.

Americans also had something that the British did not: patriotism. The Americans knew that, if they did not win the war, they would have to go back to living under the unfair British rule, if they did not die that is. Americans were able to use this spirit to fight their war harder than the British did.

Americans did not fight England's war. They disregarded the European ideas of a gentleman's war and fought, as the British considered them, dirty. The Americans shot and killed commanding officers, shot and killed their horses, attacked at night and during meal and tea times, and other war strategies that went against how the British had been taught to fight their whole life. This gave Americans a large edge over the British in individual battles.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was a severe downturn in oil prices during the early '80s detrimental to the Soviet economy?
insens350 [35]
It was a oil-exporting nation and it lost too much of an important resource, thus crippling the economy.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best describes the focus on abortion opponents today?
victus00 [196]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct answer is the one having to do with religion. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the chart, what can one most likely conclude about the relationship between industrial production and unemployment?
slega [8]
The correct answer is option D. <span>i,.</span>e <span>Declines in industrial production are tied to a rise in unemployment.

</span><span>Thus, the relationship between industrial production and unemployment is that when there will be huge declines in the production, many people will be backfired as there is no work left for the amount of helping hands.</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Would you have joined the American Revolution? Why or Why not? Give 2-3 reasons for full answer
SOVA2 [1]

I would join the American Revolution, there are many reasons to why I would do this such as the fact that Britain wasn't giving the colonists any say, it would have been dangerous to appose, and since times were different Britian making rules for America that far away wouldn't have worked out.

Britain made many rules and laws for the colonists however there was no representation from anyone who lived there. This made most of the laws and rules unfair and without their consent. This would make me very upset and angry at them especially because Britain recently made new laws and policy's to give the people a say however it didn't include the colonists. Therefore I would be very angry at the taxies and not having any say in parliment.

Another reason I and a lot of other poepel woluld join the revolution is because people who supported the Britain were harassed. If you opposed the Revolution people would call you a tory and they could violently attack you by putting tar and fethers on you. At first this wouldn't seem that bad but back in those days if hot tar gets on you when you peel it off you can get horibel infections which a lot of people died from.

Another reason is back in those days all people had to communiate with were letters. Now these letters had to go by boat all the way across the ocean. This ment that britain ruling America from that far away is bound to fail due to distance. Long distance relationships never work out

Therefore I would be 100% in for the revolution because we had no representation, its dangerous not to, and long distance relationships never work out.

Hope this helps bye!

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what direction did many jews migrate from their homeland answer
    7·1 answer
  • Instead of prospering as they expected, immigrants to the United States in
    10·1 answer
  • Which two distinct shipbuilding traditions produced the 15th Century European vessels of exploration?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a key cause of world war 2
    13·1 answer
  • Quien habla español?
    7·2 answers
  • 7th grade work please help and thank you!
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes how horses affected American Indians of the Great Plains?
    6·2 answers
  • What were TWO new aspects of Renaissance art, compared to medieval<br> art?
    12·1 answer
  • Which act is a civic responsibility?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following are some characteristics of democracy in eAncient Athens
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!