American militia fighting on their own soil was arguably the largest technical factor in them winning the war. Americans knew the land they fought on, and therefore knew the best routes to take for supplies, troop movements, and where the British may have been hiding. American militias hired <em>frontiersmen</em>, men who had grown up in the woods and knew how to hunt and travel in them, to fight on their side of the war. This allowed for a huge advantage over the British in the ground battles of the war.
Americans also had something that the British did not: patriotism. The Americans knew that, if they did not win the war, they would have to go back to living under the unfair British rule, if they did not die that is. Americans were able to use this spirit to fight their war harder than the British did.
Americans did not fight England's war. They disregarded the European ideas of a gentleman's war and fought, as the British considered them, dirty. The Americans shot and killed commanding officers, shot and killed their horses, attacked at night and during meal and tea times, and other war strategies that went against how the British had been taught to fight their whole life. This gave Americans a large edge over the British in individual battles.
It was a oil-exporting nation and it lost too much of an important resource, thus crippling the economy.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct answer is the one having to do with religion. </span>
The correct answer is option D. <span>i,.</span>e <span>Declines in industrial production are tied to a rise in unemployment.
</span><span>Thus, the relationship between industrial production and unemployment is that when there will be huge declines in the production, many people will be backfired as there is no work left for the amount of helping hands.</span>
I would join the American Revolution, there are many reasons to why I would do this such as the fact that Britain wasn't giving the colonists any say, it would have been dangerous to appose, and since times were different Britian making rules for America that far away wouldn't have worked out.
Britain made many rules and laws for the colonists however there was no representation from anyone who lived there. This made most of the laws and rules unfair and without their consent. This would make me very upset and angry at them especially because Britain recently made new laws and policy's to give the people a say however it didn't include the colonists. Therefore I would be very angry at the taxies and not having any say in parliment.
Another reason I and a lot of other poepel woluld join the revolution is because people who supported the Britain were harassed. If you opposed the Revolution people would call you a tory and they could violently attack you by putting tar and fethers on you. At first this wouldn't seem that bad but back in those days if hot tar gets on you when you peel it off you can get horibel infections which a lot of people died from.
Another reason is back in those days all people had to communiate with were letters. Now these letters had to go by boat all the way across the ocean. This ment that britain ruling America from that far away is bound to fail due to distance. Long distance relationships never work out
Therefore I would be 100% in for the revolution because we had no representation, its dangerous not to, and long distance relationships never work out.
Hope this helps bye!
