Answer:
Judging by the question itself, I'm going to hazard a guess and say that the answer is b.
Explanation:
No but seriously, this helped me out so much.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
b) Extracting teeth and organs is disgusting, and, therefore, morally wrong.
Explanation:
Immanuel Kant was a Prussian Philosopher whose works had an influence on the society. In one of his works on morality, he argued on the ethical and unethical stands on some of the actions done by people.
<em>One of them being the buying of teeth by the wealthy individual from poor peasant people. He was so repelled by the buying and selling of teeth that he declared it was under all circumstances immoral.</em>
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
Answer:
to treat someone or something in an unfair way they did her a grave ijustice is by not allowing her to file complaint
Answer:
From how the both of them reacted I have a feeling Ava is older. If I'm correct Elijah still doesn't have much common sense and he would be confused on why taking more than one sample is an issue.
Explanation:
