Answer:
I need a little more explanation
Answer:
Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.
Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.
Explanation:
it is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing
The size of a jury in charge of a criminal case depends on the weight of the criminal case. A capital criminal case according to the sixth amendment should be tried by a twelve-member jury. In case of misdemeanors, a six-member jury suffices. This is based on the Florida law of 1967 first applied in the Williams v. Florida case of 1970.
In a six-member jury, conviction has to be unanimous i.e all of the six members must approve the conviction before it is done. It is only in a twelve-member jury that conviction does not necessarily have to be unanimous.
The law made by the Nebraska legislature is unconstitutional because it allows all crimes, whether misdemeanor or felony, to be tried by a six-member jury. It also goes against the law of unanimous conviction by a six-member jury.
Answer:
I have done a lot of research on the first amendment and i believe it is most important because it protects our rights to speech, press, petition, religion, and assembly.
