McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a historic court case that determined that the necessary and proper clause gave congress the implied power to enact legislation necessary to carry out the powers granted to them.
In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the state of Maryland did not have the authority to levy taxes against the Second Bank of the United States. This was due to the fact that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 to construct the Bank.
With what is perhaps Chief Justice John Marshall's strongest decision, McCulloch rejected the extreme states' rights arguments made by counsel for Maryland in resounding language while simultaneously giving Congress vast discretionary ability to effectuate the enumerated powers.
This result gave rise to the idea of Congress' implied authority in the Constitution, which holds that Congress has powers beyond those expressly enumerated in the United States Constitution, including powers that may assist such authorities in carrying out those expressly enumerated in the Constitution.
Learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)- brainly.com/question/20593754
Answer:
8 out of every 10, or 4 out of every 5
Explanation:
since 80% of the population has shoplifted at least once (most under the age of 18).
because 80% = 80/100 which can be reduced to 8/10 (neater way to say it) or 4/5
regularly basis wise, only 10% do it (day to day, routinely, commonly)
hope this helps:)
Dissenting view refers to the judges' disagreement with public opinion. They also call it the report of a minority. There are different kinds of Dissenting opinions.
<h3>What do you mean by dissenting opinion?</h3>
Dissenting opinions often occur when there is a consensus of part of the case.
A dissenting (or opposing) opinion is a legal opinion in certain legal cases written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the public opinion of the court that results in its decision.
Thus, Dissenting view part of a supreme court decision presents the argument.
To learn more about dissenting opinion:
brainly.com/question/11651416
#SPJ4
It’ll be 10 minutes later in the afternoon and
Surveillance and investigatory actions taken by strictly private persons, such as private investigators, suspicious spouses, or nosey neighbors, aren't governed by the Fourth Amendment.