1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lara31 [8.8K]
2 years ago
14

One of these scholars relied heavily on evidence about the political process. Which scholar was that? What sort of evidence did

he use?
History
1 answer:
il63 [147K]2 years ago
6 0

The scholar that relied heavily on evidence about the political process based on the research analysis context is known as David M. Kennedy.

<h3>What evidence was used by David Kennedy?</h3>

The evidence that David Kennedy used was that the political system was made to harmonize the socio-political difference similar to that of 19th-century politics.

As he was an American historian who relied on substantial evidence, most of his debates are presented by using significant fulfillment of the civil rights plan as evidence.

In conclusion, it is concluded that the David Kennedy is the scholar.

Read more about political process

<em>brainly.com/question/7697969</em>

You might be interested in
What was an enduring legacy of the Anti-Federalists? a. The fear that a strong central government would trample on liberties. b.
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Answer choice B is incorrect as the Anti-Federalists supported the Bill of Rights.

Answer choices C, D, and E are incorrect as each of them are irrelevant to the main goal of Anti-Federalism.

Answer choice A is correct as Anti-Federalists (as their name would imply) feared a strong federal government and insisted on a Bill of Rights to keep civil liberties intact.

8 0
3 years ago
How did Confucianism impact women in Korea under the Silla dynasty?
professor190 [17]

A) it kept them subservient to men  


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me with my history questions? I attached it thanks.
Alex787 [66]

no lo se la verdad chupa pene cabeza pene

7 0
2 years ago
In both China and Japan nationalism was tied to
mixas84 [53]
In both countries, nationalism was tied to imperialistic tendencies where both nations tried conquering other lands and gain more land for their own country which would enable them to gain more prosperity over the long run. 
3 0
2 years ago
Please answer fast ASAP I give brainliest
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

1) Poor working conditions

2) Poor decisions

Explanation:

Poor working conditions: They weren't good because they worked for days for 11 hours a day, six days a week, and they didn't get a good pay.

Poor decisions: Tsar Nicholas II was unable to rule effectively. He made poor decisions that led to worsening relations with the government and increased hardship for civilians and soldiers alike.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIST!!!
    13·2 answers
  • A ruler with total power in a country is called a(n)?
    9·1 answer
  • Guilds were professional organizations that _____.
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement about women’s power during the Renaissance is true?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Ashikaga Shogunate lead to a divided Japan?
    12·1 answer
  • How were the new england settlers diffefent from virginia settlers
    15·1 answer
  • List three accomplishments of the Lewis and Clark Corps of Discovery and explain how each accomplishment was significant in the
    5·1 answer
  • Could someone give me Starter sentences examples?
    6·1 answer
  • Which effects of the Great Depression does this passage describe? Check all that apply. Bank failures business failures agricult
    7·1 answer
  • How did advances in electricity affect the city in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!