Answer:
El campo semántico es un conjunto léxico de palabras. El campo semántico de la palabra historia es el estudio de la historia con algún tema específico.
Explanation:
La historia es un estudio de asuntos pasados relacionados con algunos eventos humanos. Este es un estudio sobre eventos pasados con hechos y personajes. El campo semántico es un grupo de palabras que se refiere a un tema específico. La semántica es el estudio del lenguaje y la historia semántica es el estudio del lenguaje y su pasado. Esto también interpreta el trasfondo emocional y el experimento realizado por diferentes humanos.
THE ANSWER FOR YOUR QUESTION IS TANK
Answer:
Teaching students how to bring courage into their day-to-day school life can improve their learning, performance, and engagement at school.
Explanation:
This is a key implication of research by Professor Andrew Martin, from the Faculty of Education and Social Work, at the University of Sydney. His research on the little-studied area of academic courage is published in the current issue of School Psychology Quarterly.
The study looks at how the role of courage in the classroom can be linked to academic performance and engagement. It examined four approaches to schoolwork in high school - courage, confidence, avoidance, and helplessness."On some important outcomes (including achievement in literacy and numeracy) courage was as effective an approach as confidence. On other outcomes, confidence was more effective, however, courage was a very close second. So, while we already knew that confidence is linked to positive educational outcomes, this study is significant because it shows that courage is also an educationally effective response - particularly in the face of fear and anxiety.
"Hope I helped".
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It seems there is no question here. It is a statement. Probably, it is a true or false question, but you do not mention it. So we can help with a general answer like this.
More than believing that the anti-federalists believed in a loose construction of the constitution, what these people thought was that a strong central government was bot good for the new nation.
We are talking about the debates during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1787. During the convention, federalists and antifederalists debated about the form of government for the United States. Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, believed in a strong central government. Antifederlaits, led by Thomas Jefferson, opposed to a strong federal government because it could turn into a tyranny. But when James Madison drafted the US Bill of Rights, antifederalists accepted the new Constitution.
