1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irga5000 [103]
2 years ago
12

What is one reason John Brown could be considered a hero and one reason he could be considered a villain?

History
1 answer:
Step2247 [10]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

John Brown was a hero in the eyes of African Americans because he was willing to die to end slavery. That his actions were justified. This historian argues that John Brown is an American hero because he gave his life to try and end an evil system, slaver

You might be interested in
which of the following controls the assignment of the majority of committee seats in the house of congress ?
rjkz [21]

B

again why are you aksing these basic and simple quesitons?

5 0
3 years ago
What events led to the Spanish-American war that began in 1898?
swat32

Answer: The events that led to the Spanish-American war were America's support of the ongoing struggle by Cubans and Filipinos against Spanish rule, and the mysterious explosion of the battleship the U.S.S. Maine in the Havana Harbor.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
Does the modern United States have more in common with Athens or Sparta? Explain.
Anna11 [10]

Answer:

the modern United States is like Sparta

Explanation:

This is because the UNited States is a status quo power intent on keeping the international order as it is currently structured.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In World War II which was more important military or industrial mobilization? Give two reasons for your answer.
I am Lyosha [343]
In world war 2 industrial mobilization was more important. An example of this can be seen with the german reich. Germany at the beginning of the war had stockpiles of equipment to rely on and were a powerhouse that nearly won the war before the United States even entered however as they started getting bogged down their stockpiles dwindled and their industry could not keep up ultimately resulting in their downfall. Another reason for this is the fact it is easier to send allies equipment than it is to send them men.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hi did the Soviet Union system of government help to create conflict with the United States after World War II
    15·1 answer
  • What did henry hudson claim land for
    5·2 answers
  • How does ethnic unification occur?
    14·1 answer
  • Analyze the ways in which ancient Greece and Rome have contributed to
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Japanese often treat the native people of East Asia and their prisoners of war in territory they conquered?
    11·1 answer
  • How were the New England and Middle colonies’ economies different than the economy of the Southern colonies? What do you think c
    14·1 answer
  • What route might a ship sailing from the philippine islands to florida take?
    13·1 answer
  • What is Washington's rank in population
    13·1 answer
  • Which country's economic and political system was most positive toward promoting the Industrial Revolution?
    6·1 answer
  • What were some beliefs of the Democratic Party in the early 1800s? Check all that apply.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!