All categories

3 years ago

Arriving at a cost structure that is both profitable and hard for potential followers to match is called

1 answer:

5 0

Arriving at a cost structure that is both profitable and hard for potential followers to match is called a <u>Price Minus</u>.

<h3>What is a Price Minus?</h3>

A Price Minus is a pricing strategy that deducts some amount from the market price to attract more customers and increase profitability to the detriment of competitors.

A price minus can be used as a market penetration strategy.

Thus, using a price minus, a company can arrive at a cost structure that achieves profitability and deters potential competitors without instigating a price war.

Learn more about pricing strategies at brainly.com/question/27124956

You might be interested in

Which of the following best describes probable cause as it relates to the Fourth Amendment arrest requirements? *

ZanzabumX [31]

Answer:

B. There exists a "fair probability" that the suspect committed the crime.

Explanation:

The Fourth Amendment was part of the Bill of Rights that was added to the Constitution on December 15, 1791. It protects people from unlawful searches and seizures. This means that the police can't search you or your house without a warrant or probable cause.

The Fourth Amendment is important because the framers of the constitution realized that governmental intrusions infringed on the rights of the public.

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two people, each of whom has two children, are getting married, and they are buying a house together. They ask the real estate p

Nostrana [21]

Suggesting that they consult with an attorney is the most appropriate advice which the real estate professional should offer.

<h3>Who is an Attorney?</h3>

This is a professional who practices law and is usually involved in real estate matters through documentation of transfer of ownership.

The transfer of ownership helps to prevent issues in the future and shows the land was legally acquired which is why Attorney is the most appropriate choice.

Read more about Attorney here brainly.com/question/1013561

4 0

3 years ago

How did microsoft defend its case concerning the company's required installation of microsoft internet browsers with all install

Marrrta [24]

The browser could not be sold separately.

6 0

3 years ago

Selected condensed data taken from a recent balance sheet of Heidebrecht Inc. are as follows. HEIDEBRECHT INC. Balance Sheet (pa

Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

Explanation:

<u>Working Capital:</u>

Working Capital represents the capital available to an organisation to run its day to day expenses.

Formula= Current Assets-Current Liabilities

Total Current Assets= $45,210,000

Total Current Liabilities= $40,020,000

Working Capital= 45,210,000-40,020,000= $‭5,190,000‬

<u>Current Ratio</u>

This measures an organisation's ability to meet its financial obligations due within a year

Formula= Current Assets÷ Current Liablities

= 45,210,000÷40,020,000

= 1:13

<u>Acid-test Ratio</u>

The acid-test ratio is also known as the Quick Ratio. It represents a company's measure of liquidity and it indicates the company's ability to cover its short-term liabilities through its short-term Liquid (easily converted to cash) Assets.

Formula: (Current Asset-Inventory-Other Current Assets)÷ Current Liabilities

Current Asset- Inventory= 45,210,000-14,570,000-5,430,000= ‭25,210,000‬‬

Acid-test Ratio= ‭25,210,000‬÷ 40,020,000=0.63

Note: Other Current Assets were also deducted because we cannot easily decide whether they can be quickly or easily converted to cash or not.

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose that you were the manager of a large retail store that was currently experiencing a shoplifting problem. Every hour, app

Soloha48 [4]

<u>Answer: </u>

Benefits are amplified at a point where the minor income efficiency (MRP) is equivalent to the expense of employing a security watch. In this way, a benefit expanding firm will enlist as long as the MRP is more noteworthy than the wages or the expense of recruiting a security monitor.

On the off chance that I need to amplify benefit, at that point I won't enlist the security monitor at a compensation pace of $20 in light of the fact that the expense of recruiting is more noteworthy than the expansion to the complete income or MRP, which is equivalent to $15 (expecting that the security watchman will kill shoplifting).

The above examination shows that a security watchman will be paid a compensation rate for every hour, which is equivalent to the sum spared every hour by the security monitor for wiping out the normal shoplifting every hour.

The sum spared is an expansion to the all out income, and no benefit boosting firm would pay a compensation rate higher than the augmentations to the complete income.

8 0

3 years ago