He crowned himself emperor and spread the ideals of the republic while being a new monarch. This angered them because their people now started to realize that they don't need the "royalty" and that they could easily have their own revolution and crown themselves to be kings. British aristocracy was extremely afraid of this.
A. allow slavery where it already existed
and
D. Rely on popular sovereignty to resolve questions about slavery
HENRY CLAY of Kentucky, JOHN C. CALHOUNof South Carolina, and DANIEL WEBSTER of Massachusetts dominated national politics from the end of the War of 1812 until their deaths in the early 1850s. Although none would ever be President, the collective impact they created in Congress was far greater than any President of the era, with the exception of Andrew Jackson. There was one issue that loomed over the nation throughout their time in power — slavery. They were continuously successful in keeping peace in America by forging a series of compromises. The next generation's leaders were not.
The Gold Rush led to the rapid settlement of California which resulted in its imminent admission as the 31st state. Southerners recognized that there were few slaves in California because Mexico had prohibited slavery. Immediate admission would surely mean California would be the 16th free state, giving the non-slave-holding states an edge in the Senate. Already holding the House of Representatives, the free states could then dominate legislation.
it is true my guy hope this helps
Explanation:
Lombard, Latin Langobardus, plural Langobardi, member of a Germanic people who from 568 to 774 ruled a kingdom in Italy. The Lombards were one of the Germanic tribes that formed the Suebi, and during the 1st century ad their home was in northwestern Germany.
