Answer: $2,398.55
Explanation:
The deposit at the end of year one would have been compounded by 2 years at the end of year 3. The second year deposit would have compounded by 1 year and the third year deposit would not have compounded at all.
The future value at the end of 3 years is;
= (500 * ( 1 + 11%)²) + (750 * ( 1 + 11%)) + 950
= $2,398.55
<em>The question might not be the exact same but you can use this as a reference. </em>
Answer: Nepotism
Explanation: Nepotism is an act of granting special privileges to one's friends and family especially during
recruitment or any other opportunity. It entails using one's power to secure juicy opportunities for one's relatives, especially when they are not qualified for such opportunity. Nepotism is also an act of partiality in order to favour one's friends or relative or candidate over others.
The word "nepotism" is an Italian word and it advanced from the Italian word for nephew. It originated in the mid 17th century when popes and other religious leaders were in the habit of displaying favouritism towards their family members at the expenses of others.
Types of nepotism.
• Nepotism at work place or employment nepotism.
• Political nepotism.
• Organizational nepotism.
Answer:
6,000 units
Explanation:
The beginning inventory units are calculated below
We know
Number of units produced = Budgeted units sold + ending inventory units - beginning inventory units
35,000 units = 32,000 units + 9,000 units - beginning inventory units
35,000 units = 41,000 units - beginning inventory units
So, the beginning inventory units would be
= 41,000 units - 35,000 units
= 6,000 units
Answer:
Social capital
Explanation:
Social capital is defined as the effective or efficient functioning of the social groups through using the relationship of interpersonal, shared understanding, reciprocity, shared norms, cooperation, shared values and shared norms.
So, the social capital is the productive potential of cooperative relationships, strong and trusts. And this kind of capital help the person land the job. Within the survey it is stated that the 74% had found quality applicants by referrals of employees.
Answer:
B) countries with higher GDP per person tend to have healthier environments.
Explanation:
According to the 2020 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) elaborated by Yale and Columbia universities, a strong positive correlation exists between high GDP per capita and healthier environments. There are a few exceptions to this correlation, in Asian (especially Arab) countries where GDP per capita might be high, but the vast majority of income is received by a vary small number of people. But in the rest of the world, a high GDP per capita generally results in healthier environments.
