Answer:
Brandon needs to compare his salary to other employees of the company, he needs to pay special attention if:
- If the supervisors from other departments or units of the same company earn more than Brandon.
- If his own staff members earn a salary that is very similar to Brandon's.
- If his immediate superior earns a salary that is disproportionately higher than Brandon's.
Answer:
(A) $110,000
(B) $44,000
(C) $440,000
(D) $176,000
Explanation:
Parent corporation invested $1,000,000 in sub corpora tion for 25% of its outstanding stock
Sub corporation pays out 40% of net income of dividend each year
(A) Parent's Co's share of Sub's Co's net income for the year is $110,000
(B) Parent's Co's share of Sub's Co's share of dividend for the year is $44,000
(C) The total net income can be calculated as follows
= 110,000 ×100/25
= 11,000,000/25
= $440,000
(D) The total dividend for the year can be calculated as follows
= 440,000 ×40/100
= 440,000 × 0.4
= $176,000
Answer:
c) $25,000
Explanation:
A property dividend should be recorded in retained earnings at the property's <u>market value at date of declaration.</u>
<u>The date of declaration is the date on which the firm has made the commitment to pay the dividend. The market value on this date is the value that was considered when the board made the decision to distribute a property dividend and thus is the appropriate measure of the sacrifice to the firm.
</u>
<u>
</u>In application to the scenario, <u>the property dividend will be recorded in retained earnings at the market value at the date of declaration which is Jan 15 </u>NOT on the day it is payable.
Hence, retained earnings will reduce by $25,000
In 20X5, Elm Corp. bought 10,000 shares of Oil Corp. at a cost of $20,000. On January 15, 20X6, Elm declared a property dividend of the Oil stock to shareholders of record on February 1, 20X6, payable on February 15, 20X6. During 20X6, the Oil stock had the following market values:
January 15
$25,000
February 1
26,000
February 15
24,000
No, she can’t do that because the person who ordered the table settings paid for what they were supposed to send so she needs to of sent them if not that’s false advertising.
Answer:
The correct answer is the third option: a concern that an advertisement will run near offensive material, embarrassing an advertiser and/or degrading their products or brands.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept of <em>''content adjancency''</em> is known as the problem that many companies nowadays faces due to the new social networks that keep growing evey year. It consists in the situation where an advertiser or firm's concern is with the fact that if the advertisement will run near offensive material such that the company's name will suffer disadvantages due to the fact that their advertisement will be in those places and people might tend to relate them.
