According to the <em>"Not Too Big Enough" </em>article, some of the <em>sources of </em><em>scale economies</em><em> in the banking and finance industry</em> are as follows:
1. Bigger banks can spread their investment (fixed) costs over more output, thereby <em>reducing the </em><em>cost per unit </em><em>and making it impossible for </em><em>smaller banks </em><em>to compete in the market</em>. Most often, the smaller banks cannot afford investments in modern banking computing power and systems management.
2. Bigger banks can <em>consolidate banking functions</em> with the <em>elimination of redundancies </em>after each merger and acquisition. The cost of redundancies also gives them economies of scale.
3. Bigger banks have access to <em>larger pools of </em>deposits and will not engage in borrowing at higher costs. Smaller banks cannot tow this line because of their small scale, lacking the required funding mix.
4. Finally, advertising works best where a bank has a large geographic spread. The cost of advertising over a large area is worth it, unlike when a small bank markets its services by advertising.
2. These economies of scale mean that Oligopolies are increasing on Wall Street, and there will be further consolidations of smaller banks. Of course, every small bank would like to engage in mergers and acquisitions to grab a share of the scale economies.
Thus, <em>as banks grow large</em>, they should be mindful that enjoying the scale economies comes with the risk of crumbling like the banks regarded as <em>"too big to fail" </em>when they build on a pack of cards.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/3156270
Answer and Explanation:
As we know that Walmart has the biggest size as a strength. Even there is market saturation but still it opened various retail stores. having more than 10,000 stores in international market it seen that there is large amount of profits. Now after implementing the new e-commerce plan the Walmart leave the competition behind as it helped in covering the great amount of customers range due to this it would create a favorable response also it would be helped in online shopping. having e-commerce plan will give the benefit to generate more sales as compared to before
Answer:
Amortized to pension expense $21,600
Explanation:
Compututation of Indigo’s minimum amortization of the actuarial loss
Amortization
Projected benefit obligation($3,386,000)
Plan assets $3,617,000
Corridor percentage10%
Corridor amount $361,700
Accumulated loss $528,020
Excess loss subject to amortization $166,320
($361,700- $528,020)
Average remaining service 7.70
Amortized to pension expense $21,600
($166,320÷7.70)
Therefore the Minimum amortization of the actuarial loss will be $21,600
Answer:
the fixed factory overhead volume variance is $1,180 unfavorable
Explanation:
The computation of the fixed factory overhead volume variance is shown below
= (Actual activity - normal activity)× fixed overhead cost per unit
= (3,400 × 1.5 - 5,500) × $2.95
= (5,100 - 5,500) × 2.95
= 400 × 2.95
= $1,180 unfavorable
Hence, the fixed factory overhead volume variance is $1,180 unfavorable
Simply we applied the above formula so that the correct amount could come
