The inference illustrates that the true statement about comparative intelligence is that it compares a plantiffs fault with a defendant's and reduces the damage award proportionally.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced from the information given.
In this case, the inference illustrates that the true statement about comparative intelligence is that it compares a plantiffs fault with a defendant's and reduces the damage award proportionally.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Incomplete question. I answered from a general economic standpoint.
Answer:
<u>stay the same; decrease</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember</em>, in this scenario, it wasn't as though the mentioned workers lost their jobs, they only had their hours reduced by their employers; so they are not <u>unemployed</u>. This, therefore, implies that the unemployment rate will stay the same.
The labor force participation rate in simple words refers to the percentage of those who are currently employed or looking for a job within an economy. If the working hours are reduced, it may diminish the zeal among the workforce of an economy to work or find work because <u>they may perceive they''ll earn less.</u>
Answer:
a. The common stockholders.
Explanation:
A company's retained earnings have a financing cost associated with them because retained earnings belong to the common stockholders.
Retained earnings can be defined as the accumulated profits or net income generated by an organization but are not distributed or given as dividends to the stockholders, rather are reinvested in to the business.
Generally, retained earnings are used to pay off debts, used for capital expenditures and working capitals.
Retained earnings represents the total stockholders' equity reinvested back into the company.
The correct answer is C. Money is safer in the bank.
Explanation:
The main point or position of Jonas is that savings should be kept in an account due to the costs associated with this. In this context, the only argument that refutes Jonas' position and it is directly related to the main point of Jonas is "Money is safer in the bank" because even if keeping savings in a bank requires to pay fees this guarantees the money will be safe, which does not occur if Jonas keeps his savings at home. Moreover, the safety factor makes the option of the bank better, which refutes Jonas position.
Answer:$10,350
Explanation:
3,450* 3 (month minimum) = 10,350
