Which type of argument involves acknowledging various positions on the issue at hand, describing each perspective respectfully a
nd fairly, and finding common ground among the different perspectives for the purpose of getting people to listen and work together, rather than trying to convince them to accept the author's position on an issue? Select one:
The Rogerian argument is the type that seeks to establish a common ground on the issue that is at hand insteading of convincing people to accept the authors position.
<h3>What is the Rogerian type of argument?</h3>
This is a type of argument that has to do with the establishment of an existing middle ground between different parties that do not have the same opinion.
This type of argument was established by Carl Rogers. It seeks to find a middle ground between authors and audiences.
I would say that sometimes you would not 'identify' a mistake in your head. Also if you read it out loud you might realize how it does not make sense in your sentence.
